Listing 1 - 10 of 105 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
A busca pela compreensão de si mesma é um dos propósitos mais antigos da humanidade. Em boa parte das investigações sobre o assunto, entende-se que os seres são constituídos de cognição, emoções e ações em constante interação. Embora possuam semelhanças, as abordagens propostas apresentam inconsistências, divergindo, por exemplo, na natureza das interconexões ou nos portadores destes elementos. Muitas perspectivas consideram unicamente os humanos como detentores da cognição e emoção, enquanto outras entendem que animais não humanos ou sistemas como robôs poderiam, de um modo ou de outro, possuir cognição, emoções e, assim, de alguma forma, ser considerados agentes morais. Este livro reúne contribuições de diversas áreas e perspectivas referentes ao estudo da cognição, emoção e ação e das conexões entre elas. Os seus capítulos foram agrupados em três partes, de acordo com a predominância de seu conteúdo: história da filosofia; ciências cognitivas; ciências humanas e sociais. Há, ainda, uma entrevista com o Prof. Lauro F. B. da Silveira, a quem este livro é dedicado.
Choose an application
Dans ce livre tres original, Markus Gabriel avance une theorie du soi humain qui surmonte les blocages inherents aux positions standards en philosophie de l'esprit contemporaine. Son point de vue, le neo-existentialisme, est integralement antinaturaliste, en ce sens qu'il rejette toute theorie selon laquelle l'ensemble de nos meilleures connaissances scientifiques naturelles serait pleinement capable de rendre compte de l'esprit humain. L'auteur montre plutôt que l'esprit humain consiste en une proliferation ouverte de vocabulaires mentalistes. Leur rôle dans la forme de vie humaine consiste à rendre compte du fait que l'être humain ne se fond pas simplement dans la nature inanimee et le reste du regne animal. Les humains s'appuient sur un autoportrait qui les situe dans un contexte aussi large que possible au sein de l'univers. Ce qui distingue cet autoportrait de notre connaissance de la realite naturelle, c'est que nous changeons en vertu de nos croyances, vraies ou fausses, au sujet de nous-mêmes.
Choose an application
In this highly accessible book, a distinguished philosopher says current focus on the brain conceals the real powers of the mind. Edward Pols revisits one of the basic topics of philosophy: what is the distinction between mind and body and what is the relation between them? He disagrees fundamentally with the many contemporary philosophers who concentrate on the findings of neurophysiology and cognitive science and so look only to the brain for the causes and explanation of mind. Pols concedes the importance of such scientific studies but maintains that they focus on the infrastructure of mind and ignore the momentous difference between the infrastructure and mind itself.Pols calls upon the reader to attend to mind itself as a concrete and experientially available reality. This kind of attention, he argues persuasively, reveals mind to be at once causally dependent on the brain and causally effective on the physical processes of the brain and the world. Pols also examines the hierarchical view of mind and causality first proposed by Plato and Aristotle, the supersession of that view by the received scientific doctrine of causality, and the mistaken denial of the power of the mind to know an independent reality-a denial that resulted from the philosophical doctrines about knowing developed in the era that began with Descartes and ended with Kant.
Choose an application
Building on contemporary research in embodied cognition, enactivism, and the extended mind, this book explores how social institutions in contemporary neoliberal nation-states systematically affect our thoughts, feelings, and agency. Human beings are, necessarily, social animals who create and belong to social institutions. But social institutions take on a life of their own, and literally shape the minds of all those who belong to them, for better or worse, usually without their being self-consciously aware of it. Indeed, in contemporary neoliberal societies, it is generally for the worse. In The Mind-Body Politic, Michelle Maiese and Robert Hanna work out a new critique of contemporary social institutions by deploying the special standpoint of the philosophy of mind—in particular, the special standpoint of the philosophy of what they call essentially embodied minds—and make a set of concrete, positive proposals for radically changing both these social institutions and also our essentially embodied lives for the better.
Philosophy of mind. --- Political philosophy. --- Philosophy of Mind. --- Political Philosophy.
Choose an application
Larry M. Jorgensen provides a systematic reappraisal of Leibniz's philosophy of mind, revealing the full metaphysical background that allowed Leibniz to see farther than most of his contemporaries. In recent philosophy much effort has been put into discovering a naturalized theory of mind. Leibniz's efforts to reach a similar goal three hundred years earlier offer a critical stance from which we can assess our own theories. But while the goals might be similar, the content of Leibniz's theory significantly diverges from that of today's thought. Perhaps surprisingly, Leibniz's theological commitments yielded a thoroughgoing naturalizing methodology: the properties of an object are explicable in terms of the object's nature. Larry M. Jorgensen shows how this methodology led Leibniz to a fully natural theory of mind.
Philosophy of mind. --- Consciousness. --- Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm,
Choose an application
Que faisons-nous, au juste, lorsque nous parlons d'"esprit", ou que nous attribuons des pensées à d'autres personnes ? Penser, est-ce déjà agir ? Les concepts de pensée, d'intention ou de compréhension font-ils référence à des processus "internes"? Pour répondre à ces questions, Pierre Steiner développe une conception déontologique de l'esprit ("dé-ontologique et normative"), en dialogue avec Wittgenstein, les premiers écrits de Richard Rorty et le pragmatisme normatif de Robert Brandom. Il propose en outre une lecture renouvelée de l'expérimentalisme social et politique de John Dewey - dont l'une des conséquences pourrait être d'externaliser l'esprit dans des pratiques scientifiques et des dispositifs techniques. Contre une définition privée et centralisante de la pensée, ce livre délocalise l'esprit dans des réseaux intriqués de jeux de langage, de formes de vie et de techniques sédimentées. Ce faisant, il confronte le pragmatisme à un certain nombre de thèses analytiques dominantes en philosophie de l'esprit, comme le naturalisme, le représentationnalisme ou l'identification de la pensée à un ensemble de faits intracrâniens. "Désaturer l'esprit", c'est rendre compte de la dimension publique de la cognition, mais aussi de nos croyances et de nos valeurs
Choose an application
Professor Rubinoff argues that Collingwood's later thought is a dialectical outcome of his early thought, and that the rapprochement between the various forms of knowledge. He thus provides a new conceptual framework which views the whole of Collingwood's system.
Choose an application
Choose an application
This book introduces concepts in philosophy of mind and neurophilosophy. Inside, three scholars offer approaches to the problems of identity, consciousness, and the mind. In the process, they open new vistas for thought and raise fresh controversies to some of the oldest problems in philosophy. The first chapter focuses on the identity problem. The author employs an explanatory model he christened sense-phenomenalism to defend the thesis that personal identity is something or a phenomenon that pertains to the observable/perceptible aspect of the human person. The next chapter explores the problem of consciousness. It deploys the new concept equiphenomenalism as a model to show that mental properties are not by-products but necessary products of consciousness. Herein, the notion of qualia is a fundamental and necessary product that must be experienced simultaneously with neural activities for consciousness to be possible. The last chapter addresses the mind/body problem. It adopts the new concept proto-phenomenalism as an alternative explanatory model. This model eliminates the idea of a mind. As such, it approaches the mind-body problem from a materialistic point of view with many implications such as, the meaning(lessness) of our existence, the possibility of thought engineering as well as religious implications.
Philosophy of mind. --- Mind, Philosophy of --- Mind, Theory of --- Theory of mind --- Philosophy --- Cognitive science --- Metaphysics --- Philosophical anthropology --- Metaphysics. --- Philosophy of Mind. --- God --- Ontology --- Philosophy of mind
Choose an application
"Explaining how various theories about the nature of mind can accommodate mental causation requires some groundwork. It requires formulating these theories about the nature of mind more precisely. It also requires getting clearer about the nature of causation, which in turn has two aspects: the nature of the relata of causation and the nature of the relation itself. These are the tasks of this chapter"-- Provided by publisher.
Causation. --- Causation --- Counterfactuals (Logic) --- Philosophy of mind. --- Psychological aspects.
Listing 1 - 10 of 105 | << page >> |
Sort by
|